Photonic Shunkan

When I first started shooting with an interchangeable lens camera, I chose a Canon and considered myself a Canon shooter for a long time. These days I shoot more Fujifilm, both the X and the GFX Systems. I have kept the Canon EF mount system because there are so many lenses you can't get for Fuji mounts. Today, I would discuss how the field vs studio camera difference  that we previously discussed comes into play in practice. Of late I have been shooting a lot of macro work after making friends with Kiki the neighbourhood brushtail possum! They are encountered often in suburbia here in Australia. Here's a little link to the story on Instagram . Kiki is quite the Fujifilm fangirl. When she sees my camera, she comes rushing down from the treetops to say hello. She is fascinated by the Fujifilm camera and goes right up to it, sniffing it and touching it with her hands. There were issues I had with shooting this scene. The biggest one comes from the fact that poss...

One of the oddities produced by the dawn of the digital photography era is the multi-purpose professional camera. A typical example is the Canon 5D series (current iteration = 5D Mark IV). It can be used for a bit of sport/wildlife/action, portraiture, weddings, travel, street etc. It is a jack of all trades. In future, the multi-purpose consumer level camera will be some sort of small format mirrorless-EVF (ML-EVF) camera (eg M4/3, APS-C, 35mm small format). It will be interesting to see if it continues to remain acceptable for professionals to shoot with such devices across multiple scenarios. Such multi-purpose cameras are becoming increasingly capable eg high resolution, fast frame rate, good ergonomics/portability. They will remain popular and retain some sort of place in the market. The rise to dominance of the multi-purpose professional camera can be put down to the loss of camera differentiation caused by the mass extinction of speciality camera firms from the apocalyptic e...

It is a sad fact that today some algorithm ensures the populist proliferation of gross misinformation on the internet. In an age of misinformation being spread like wildfire over the internet, readers are asked to critically evaluate the information they have been presented with: 1. Is the source of information credible? 2. Is it mechanistically plausible (in photography, on the basis of the science of optics)? 3. If objections have been raised, have these objections been adequately dealt with? Sadly, the chances are that the internet will ignore credible sources of information along with science and unquestioningly listen to Suckerberg-type algorithm driven popularisations of egregious falsehoods instead. But despite the chances that all reasoned arguments and scientifically credible evidence will be ignored, proof that the claims made in this YouTube segment are utter nonsense will be shown to the rare thinkers amongst readers: This flies in the face of what Canon st...